What Does Low Hemoglobin And Hematocrit Mean

CONSUMER LAW: Law No. 24,240. Public Utilities. Part II

As mentioned in the first part of this article, the Public Utilities s are those tangible and intangible benefits that people receive home or workplace, taking in return a fee, and are provided by the State or by private companies under the regulation, control and surveillance of the state.

is also considered as User public utilities, is a person who uses a particular house public service, so you can be a landlord, tenant and / or legal owner, whose rights are guaranteed by the CN, the regulatory frameworks for each service and the Consumer Protection Act. Continuing

important aspects of the Consumer Protection Act on the Public Services, established the principle of "reciprocity of treatment", meaning that the company is obliged to adopt the same criteria used for late charges in cases of refunds and rebates (art. 26).

in Law (art. 27) requires the utilities to enable a Register of Claims, shall be the personal attention and give proof of each claim, with self-identification to timely make the user.

utility companies must inform the user about security conditions, cautions about the facilities and devices that are used for the enjoyment of the service (art. 28), nothing in this article relates to the provisions of arts. 5 and 6 of the Consumer Protection Act, that reference to the protection of the value of individual life.

The Act empowers the supervisory authority to verify the proper functioning of the measuring instruments used by companies providing, when there is doubt about the measurements made by them, demanding that all instruments must be recognized and authorized by law.

consumer bills should reach the home user with no less than ten days prior to its expiration date.

The doctrine holds that "the essential character of public service is the continuity, so that with respect to the interruption of the service, the (art. 30) of the Act, resulting from such forcefulness that deserves transcription the same "Where the provision of public services will be uninterrupted or any disturbance is presumed to be due to causes attributable to the company involved. The claim made by the user, the company has a maximum of thirty (30) days to demonstrate that the interruption or alteration is not attributable. Otherwise, the company will refund the total amount of service not rendered within the period specified above. This provision does not apply where the value of service provided is not deducted from the invoice. The user can lodge complaint over the interruption or alteration of service and up to fifteen (15) days after the invoice due date ".

In the case of electric service: What are the steps to follow when deficiency in service and damaged electrical appliances?

should proceed to make a claim against the supplier, such claim must contain basic requirements:
1 .- Name, National ID, address and telephone. 2 .- Demonstrating his capacity as holder of the service (with copy of deed, lease, etc.).. 3 .- Copy of last bill paid. 4 .- Budgets or repair bills (if possible by qualified service marking device damaged) should spell (affected appliances, repairs to make and cost of labor and materials used in it), signed technical and clarifying the intervener.

When damaged artifacts, resulting not repairable, the service must issue a record of the components damaged and unable to repair. In this case you must attach a budget to purchase a comparable device and the damaged model.

FOR MORE INFORMATION DO NOT HESITATE to contact the telephone (0342) 455.6354 or (0342) 155.472616 or e-mail: @ gmail.com or ma_sandria@yahoo.com.ar abogado.mas

How Many Panadol To Die

on Sunday went to see the road ( the road , dir. John Hillcoat, 2009), based on the book of Cormac McCarthy . set in a postapocalyptic world, following in the footsteps of a man and his son for a devastated landscape and devastating: the eternally gray sky, the trees burnt black land, houses and cities, or what remains of them looted. and there they are, pushing a shopping cart with their meager belongings, as two bichicomes, looking for something to eat and a place where to spend the night without dying of cold. we do not know what happened, but we do know that the father, long ago, lived in a house with the mother of his son, running water, electricity, a piano. what is said, a normal life. are not the only survivors, but the best thing that can happen is not cross with anyone: cannibalism, says the father, is one of the biggest fears. a hard film, uncomfortable, at times suffocating. hopeless.

departure, the dirt piled up against the sidewalks and poor guy sleeping wrapped in blankets in a corner seemed to recreate a scene from the movie. but of course, was not the film was just Galarza Street.

Impetigo Or Cold Sores

FAMILY LAW - Concubinage - Compensation for death

confirm that a man can not collect compensation for the death of his concubine because the law allows compensation for moral damage only to the heirs. However, in a minority voting interest held that provision unconstitutional.

Hall 2 of the Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Federal upheld a ruling of first instance where a person denied the compensation for moral damages for the death of his mistress, because the law only allows that compensation for the heirs of the victim, which excludes those who are not married.

However, the minority vote, signed by Alfred Gusman, said that this distinction is unconstitutional and should be given the compensation claimed.

In the case, a person who lived with his wife, who has a son, claimed compensation for moral damage before the death of his mistress after a shootout between a robber and a police officer in a group.

According to Article 1078 Civil Code, upon the death of the victim to claim compensation for moral damage "will only action the heirs." Under the Code, children are forced heirs and the surviving spouse, not the concubines.

vote in the majority, Judge Ricardo Guarinoni said "as I have been holding in my wishes expressed previously, I believe that Article 1078 Civil Code can have no other interpretation than to refer to the heirs that are of that character at the time of death, which in the case excludes the concubine for not fulfilling this condition. "

Continuing the analysis, the maid said "there is no reason to support an interpretation that is contrary to law. You can agree that the modern tort law emphasizes full compensation of victims, but this does not mean to distort the laws. "

These arguments were supported by Judge James Kiernan.

with colleagues in dissent, Judge Gusman said "Law No. 17,711, granted by Article 1078 the current wording was passed in 1968 in a de facto government. For this period the majority view to the view that cohabitation was a link disvalioso and even immoral. "

"If I stick to an extreme positivist view, it is clear that the plaintiff is not entitled to its claim, the rule limiting standing to the heirs of the deceased and the domestic partner has no right to inherit," said Judge .

"This restriction disturbed my sense of justice, not conceive that a person can not claim the moral damage he allegedly caused the death of the partner with whom he was bound by marital ties not regularized, which presupposes the bonds of love, affection , projects of common life, and so on. "Gusman said.

addition, the judge said he "has no basis to argue that before the death of a partner as a result of a wrongful act, the surviving spouse suffers a different pain than the victim's partner, in short there is no reason to compensate the moral damages and not to the widower's companion on fact. "

"Entering the field of examples, compared to the same wrongful act that causes the death of his partner and their pet, may sue a hypothetical moral damages for the death of the animal recipient of your affection as direct victim, but not can claim moral damages for the death of his partner in life, "he said.

In conclusion, the judge noted that "Article 1078 Civil Code, by failing to provide protection to the couple that has not been formalized by marriage, came unconstitutional."

Source: www.cij.gov.ar