Accidentally Swallowed Listerine

news about the conflict in the Fonteta

Since the dawn of time (ie, when there was no argument or girl) I got the call to provide a photo of me this new website.

take this opportunity to trace the developments in the conflict:

- Neighbors explain here and here:

- News on the recent march in defense of the neighborhood, and here here.
- Other blogs pick up the conflict and make local history here and here .
- Candidates in municipal opposition visiting neighbors in pre-election here and here .

Cobra Walkietalkie Babymonitor

, condemned to a cell phone company

The Court of First Instance ordered the company Rufino Claro (formerly called CTI Movil) to pay to a client the sum of $ 13,000 for a received message. The story started when a user of course received a text message sent by the mobile phone company which textually read: "Congratulations! CTI informs him that he won $ .10.000. Must remove you purchased your CTI. " Then tells the user in its application that communicated with the asterisk 611 where he said that although was very well attended and he acknowledged that the message had been sent by CTI never could provide a solution to their situation. Exhausted all CTI document sent letter intimating formally to pay the sum, and then ended up filing a lawsuit against TCI, now Claro. The defendant company argued that the message was not sent by CTI, but from the website of the company. Q ue said CTI's website is in widespread use, or that anyone has access to it and could have sent that message to your cell of course, as a joke.

The Court of First Instance of Rufino upheld the claim and dismissed the argument attempted by the company demandada considerando que “media en el caso una obligación de seguridad consistente en que el obligado debe realizar todos los comportamientos que sean necesarios y conducentes al logro del resultado buscado, aún cuando no hubiesen sido expresamente previstos y, desde el lado negativo, evitar toda conducta que ponga en peligro o que lo impida o dificulte. Queda comprendido en ello el deber de evitar todo daño a la persona o bienes del cocontratante.” Es decir, condenó a la empresa demandada por no haber cumplido con su obligación de seguridad. Puntualmente dijo “ el envío del mensaje por un tercero no resulta imprevisible e inevitable, plexo que la demandada debió advertir al usuario desde el mismo point of owning a website with the ability to receive messages with these characteristics. "

The ruling is the number is 1468 and December 13, 2010.

Source: eljurista.net

Tibicos Mushroom Side Effects

UTEDYC - CST. 462/06 - 28% INCREASE IN CIVIL LAW

}

CST. 462/06 - 28% INCREASE

Workers gathered in the Convention Working Coleticvo 462/06 (CAT 462/06), agreed to a wage increase 28% from February 2011.

The increase will apply on the existing basic to

31/12/2010, the following wage increases, not cumulative:


a) 10% as of February 1, 2011,
b ) 6% from May 1, 2011,

to 07/31/2011, the following wage increases, not cumulative:

c) 6% from August 1, 2011,
d ) 6% from November 1, 2011,

New Salary Scale

Employers who have granted wage increases to account for future increases may, acquit and compensate until their concurrence with the wage increases agreed in the agreement.

also modified the arts. 1, 14, 25, 41.1, 42.1, 462/06 CST.

The wage agreement and minutes signed by the parties, is not yet approved by the Ministry of Labour.